היועמ"שית לבג"ץ: לא אגן על מינוי יהודה אליהו למנכ"ל רמ"י

הערכה

The Attorney General's refusal to defend a government appointment before the High Court signals a rare and significant rupture between the legal establishment and the executive branch. The core issue is whether procedural flaws in the selection process are severe enough to void the appointment entirely. With the government securing external legal representation, the stage is set for a direct courtroom confrontation. The delayed hearing suggests the court is taking the matter seriously, and the outcome could set a precedent for the legal boundaries of ministerial appointment discretion.