Qui est responsable du « montage » du procès de Netanyahu ? | Premier épisode
Les juges cherchent à abandonner le chef de corruption sans lequel le procès de Netanyahu n'aurait pas été ouvert. Qui et pourquoi a conduit à l'ouverture du procès qui a déchiré le pays. Premier entretien…
Évaluation
The judges' reported desire to drop the bribery charge, which was the legal foundation of the entire case, raises serious questions about the original decision to prosecute. This development suggests a potential collapse of the prosecution's core argument, forcing a reassessment of who initiated and drove the case. The first installment of this interview series will likely examine the political and legal actors responsible for launching the trial that deeply divided Israeli society. The coming episodes may reveal whether the charges were ever legally sound or motivated by other considerations.