L'AIPAC a attaqué un démocrate pour avoir financé l'ICE. Maintenant, elle soutient un candidat qui a voté de la même manière.
Le super PAC de l'AIPAC dépense beaucoup pour soutenir la représentante Haley Stevens dans la primaire sénatoriale démocrate du Michigan — malgré un bilan qui inclut le même vote de financement de l'ICE que le…
Évaluation
AIPAC's selective application of its own litmus test on ICE funding reveals a political calculus that prioritizes institutional relationships over ideological consistency. The group's willingness to back a candidate with the same voting record it previously attacked suggests that its endorsement decisions are shaped by broader strategic considerations, not single-issue purity. The outcome of this primary will test whether such inconsistency carries political costs or is simply accepted as standard interest-group maneuvering.