Soberanía a martillazos: la payasada de vigilante de Zvi Sukkot perjudica la seguridad y la ley israelíes - editorial
Sukkot podría haber exigido su retirada a través del FDI, el gobierno o los tribunales. Lo que no podía hacer era nombrarse a sí mismo juez, oficial de ejecución y equipo de demolición.
Valoración
Zvi Sukkot took the law into his own hands, and that act undermines the very security he claims to protect. When a settler activist bypasses the state's legal channels and demolishes Palestinian property personally, he erodes the IDF's operational control and the government's authority. The editorial points out that Sukkot had legitimate avenues for redress, but chose vigilantism instead. The damage here is not just to the specific structure he tore down. It is to the principle that no individual, however passionate, gets to decide which laws apply and which do not. Watch how the security establishment responds: any hesitation to prosecute sends a dangerous message.

