"In the end someone will die": 31 years ago - someone already "died" here | Shir-Li Golan
The blood of anyone who does not toe the line with the authorities is permissible. Is it any wonder that there are those who allow themselves to threaten the murder of journalists, whose role is…
Assessment
The piece invokes a 31-year-old precedent to argue that threats against journalists are rooted in a longstanding tolerance for punishing those who defy authority. The author suggests that when the blood of dissenters is treated as permissible, violent rhetoric against the press becomes an expected outcome. The core issue is the erosion of the public's right to information, framed as a direct consequence of official attitudes. Readers should watch whether this historical parallel gains traction in public discourse or prompts official responses.