The Lebanon Agreement Proved - Politicians Change Opinions According to Their Seats in the Knesset | Yoram Dori
A problematic agreement is usually preferable to another round of fighting. You can always break the agreement and fight, if there is no choice.
Assessment
The piece argues that the Lebanon agreement, despite its flaws, is preferable to another round of fighting, noting that agreements can always be broken if necessary. This reflects a pragmatic view that political positions shift based on seating arrangements in the Knesset. The reader should watch for how coalition dynamics influence future security decisions.