Maybe God Is showing Trump why Israel cannot trust Hamas
Negotiations with regimes and terrorist organizations are not normal business negotiations. You cannot assume that because someone agreed to or even signed something yesterday, they will honor it tomorrow. Op-ed
Assessment
This op-ed argues that Israel's dealings with Hamas cannot be treated like standard commercial negotiations, where signed agreements carry weight. The core claim is that trust is structurally absent when dealing with terrorist organizations, so past commitments offer no reliable basis for future conduct. The piece appears aimed at influencing perceptions of ongoing talks, likely in the context of hostage or ceasefire discussions. Readers should watch whether this framing gains traction in policy debates, as it suggests a fundamental skepticism toward any negotiated outcome.