Baharav-Miara insists on imposing her position and loses
As the bribery case in Benjamin Netanyahu's trial weakens, the justification for splitting the Attorney General's powers strengthens. Also the moralistic discourse that immediately stands up to defend Baharav-Miara is part of the problem.
Assessment
The piece argues that the weakening of the bribery charge in Benjamin Netanyahu's trial strengthens the case for splitting the attorney general's powers. It criticizes reflexive defensive discourse around the attorney general, suggesting that such behavior is itself part of the problem. The stakes involve the structure of legal oversight and public trust in the justice system.